Oberjuerge Named Partner

amo3

ENGLAND PONTICELLO & ST.CLAIR (EPS) proudly announced that  Alex M. Oberjuerge has been named a partner in the firm.  Mr. Oberjuerge is in his eighth year with EPS.

In 2018, Mr. Oberjuerge was successful on the California state bar workers’ compensation certified specialist examination.  In addition to his workers’ compensation defense activities, Mr. Oberjuerge is also active defending civil litigation matters and those claims brought under the LHWCA.  EPS celebrated this announcement with a firm event for family and friends.

 

 

EPS U.S. Supreme Court Maritime Case Stands Submitted

43

The United States Supreme Court heard oral argument on March 25, 2019 in the matter of The Dutra Group v Batterton, which case now stands submitted for decision.   The issue to be addressed is the scope of a seaman’s damages under the general maritime law, namely whether punitive damages may be sought.   On behalf of the maritime employer/vessel owner Defendant, EPS was successful in having both the Trial Court and 9th Circuit certify the interlocutory appeals sought.   Wilmer Hale joined in as Supreme Court co- counsel.

1

The EPS team has long made law in all areas of their practice, be it general liability, LHWCA, subrogation, CA workers’ compensation or maritime law.   On just this issue now to be decided by the SCOTUS, EPS has previously litigated the Jones Act/general maritime damages scope in multiple matters at all judicial levels- (CA) State and Federal Trial Courts, State and Federal Courts of Appeal, and now, the U.S. Supreme Court.   This issue will now be decided for all of America by the SCOTUS.

16

4

45

UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT GRANTS REVIEW OF EPS CASE

Supreme Court Vehicle Searches

On December 7, 2018, the United States Supreme Court granted Defendant’s Writ of Certiorari in the matter of DUTRA GROUP v BATTERTON.   Defendant Dutra, represented by Barry Ponticello at EPS, sought to strike the punitive damages alleged by Plaintiff under the general maritime unseaworthiness action. The matter has proceeded through the Trial level and 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.

In an issue of national maritime importance, the United States Supreme Court will now decide whether seaman can pursue punitive damages under the general maritime law for a vessel’s unseaworthiness.

PROBLEM CASE/DIFFICULT ATTORNEYS: EPS Morning Speaker Series

35882628_10155584293892283_5568596249415778304_n

On June 21, 2018 EPS held another of it’s Morning Speaker Series events, this time a lively session centering on the topic of problem cases and difficult attorneys.  Applicant counsel Phillip Cohen joined EPS for this event.  Mr. Cohen, a noted and longtime San Diego practitioner, advised the assembled why injured workers seek him out, common issues he sees caused by claims administrators, why and when he seeks penalties and sanctions, as well as why some of his matters pend for such a long time.   Alex Oberjuerge of EPS provided the defense view, with strategies for combatting these difficult cases and counsel.  Barry Ponticello also provided some history and litigation tactics regarding these matters.  As with all the Morning Speaker Series events, industry leaders were once again brought together for cutting edge discussion and food for thought.

35810604_10155584587427283_5564054519068753920_n

35815100_10155584294322283_7805857250911715328_n

35883024_10155584293107283_4176196993405681664_n

9th Circuit Victory for EPS

9th Circuit

The very questions of injury and proof were before the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in a recently argued LHWCA matter.    The matter arose as an orthopedic and pulmonary cumulative trauma claim of a decades long maritime pile driver asserted against his last maritime employer.  The matter was tried over multiple days by Barry Ponticello, with an ALJ finding of no orthopedic or pulmonary injury.  This decision was affirmed by the BRB.

At the 9th Circuit, the Claimant sought an alternative standard of proof in multiple employer cases, as well as differing occupational disease injury standards.  Briefing opposing these theories was undertaken by Renee St.Clair and Mr. Ponticello, with Mr. Ponticello arguing the matter before the 3 judge appellate panel, who affirmed the Trial Decision.

06-11-18-KellJa-Memorandum Affirming -Final Disposition